I'm two-thirds through this book, and have been disappointed so far. The plot seems trite and predictable, and the writing feels flat.
I've just learned that the author is eighteen-years-old - should I grade this book on a curve? Or, since it's been published in mass-market, should I judge the book equally against its peers?
Has anyone else read this?
I've just learned that the author is eighteen-years-old - should I grade this book on a curve? Or, since it's been published in mass-market, should I judge the book equally against its peers?
Has anyone else read this?
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Re: Eragon
Wed, May 26, 2004 - 10:41 AMI keep meaning to pick that one up, but now I'm not so sure. Does the author's age really matter to how well the book is written? What I mean is- is the book any more enjoyable because its written by a young person? -
-
Re: Eragon
Thu, June 10, 2004 - 6:19 PMof course it doesn't matter- if its published it should stand against other published works- if it isn't holding up then its an issue- there have been- in history- many young authors, artists and musicians who were brilliant at a young age- maybe he'll grow in to a talent. -
-
Re: Eragon
Tue, June 22, 2004 - 12:38 PMTrue.. Its my understanding that Mary Shelley was only 19 when she wrote Frankenstein. I know there are many other examples but that's the first to pop into my head.
-
-
